Bohic

Unfortunately, $ iperf3 -c ping.online.net -P1 -i 5 -R iperf3: error - the server is busy running a test. try again later $ iperf3 -c speedtest.serverius.net -P1 -i 5 -p 5002 -R -t 30 iperf3: error - the server is busy running a test. try again later But I can run an iperf3 in server mode on a machine that's on the same network: $ iperf3 -c 195.154.0.0 -P1 -i 5 -R -t 30 Connecting to host 195.154.0.0, port 5201 Reverse mode, remote host 195.154.166.219 is sending [ 4] local 176.36.0.0 port 55786 connected to 195.154.0.0 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Ban

Performances with Ukrainian networks are pretty decent in general. $ iperf3 -c iperf.volia.net -P1 -i 5 Connecting to host iperf.volia.net, port 5201 [ 4] local 176.36.0.0 port 56870 connected to 82.144.193.18 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd [ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 51.3 MBytes 86.1 Mbits/sec 75 103 KBytes [ 4] 5.00-10.00 sec 50.6 MBytes 85.0 Mbits/sec 82 73.5 KBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 102 MByte

Yes, it may even work with Microsoft Internet Exporer. But there are people who are not willing to run trash on their computer and I'm part of them.

The Javascript is broken, cannot even click on "BEGIN TEST". See, https://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fbeta.speedtest.net%2F%23&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0 302 errors, dozens of unclosed tags and syntax error. How do you want to take this seriously? That would also only concern 2. - All other points are still valid. I also don't understand why you are using this trash, is wget that hard to use?

Ok, I think I'll quit here. I was expecting to find respectable savvies here, not script-kiddies. Quite a disappointment. Thanks @oles and @Melanxolik for the constructive posts though.

That's an example of a single socket connection with wget. $ wget -O /dev/null http://paris.cdn.mediactive-network.net/speedtest/5000Mo.dat-4 /dev/null 0%[ ] 7.26M 396KB/s eta 2h 7m The same target with 5 simultaneous connections: $ aria2c -x5 http://paris.cdn.mediactive-network.net/speedtest/5000Mo.dat-d /dev -o null --allow-overwrite=true --file-allocation=none [#8e3975 122MiB/4.6GiB(2%) CN:5 DL:2.0MiB ETA:37m58s] PS: Traffic to this host is routed via fiord.net (AS50499) which seems to be their most congested link.

No I cannot use this. 1. It requires a web browser. 2. It requires Flash. I'm never going to install Flash Player on my machine. 3. It opens multiple connections simultaneously (4 iirc). 4. It's proprietary, no documentation, no sources.

Hi, I'm not sure to understand, I've posted a couple of traceroutes and throughput tests using tcp/http from various remote hosts using wget. You can find them in my posts on this topic.

Do you have anything constructive to write but your insults? If no then I'd appreciate that you stay out of this discussion.

It was a reaction to his attempt to write a sentence in English. Furthemore I did not know that this is a forum about Russian language. I thought that it was about networks in Ukraine.

Hi, I'm not using any wireless device There are several traceroutes in the topic's feed. All the tests were down with ingress traffic. I will test out the egress a little bit later and post the results here.

I'm studying Russian every day. Учи английский, пригодится. Too easy...

Why? It just feels like you simply do not like this information/topic to be discussed publicly.

I'm not expecting to resolve that issue on this forum, I'm just raising awareness and discussing it. Can you explain what's eccentric in this? As mentioned several times, I'm still waiting for comment from lanet.ua. Yet nothing. I've also posted on https://rada.lanet.ua/but posts are subject to moderation and so far my topic has not showed up.

I'm a bit surprised by the amount of stupid posts, I thought that discussions were kind of constructive on that bbs. It's unlikely that it's just the local channel. If you icmp ping 194.60.69.121 which is the host for www.lanet.ua from a remote location you will see that even this is unstable. It's 9:34 p. m. and that's what I'm getting: $ ping 194.60.69.121 PING 194.60.69.121 (194.60.69.121) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 194.60.69.121: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=77.9 ms 64 bytes from 194.60.69.121: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=77.8 ms 64 bytes from 194.60.69.121: icmp_seq=3 t