Jump to content

Ланет: congestions


Recommended Posts

странное заявление на русскоязычном форуме!

 

It was a reaction to his attempt to write a sentence in English. Furthemore I did not know that this is a forum about Russian language. I thought that it was about networks in Ukraine.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

1 Mbit/s in Frankfurt from Tier1єs like Level3 or Telia cost near 0.6-0.7 euro Per mbit! Most cheapest traffic is from IXes, but 10GE port at De-CIX cost 1900 euro + two crosing 100 euro each -> mi

Ни хао! Хочу домой гарантированный канал. Покупать я его, конечно, не буду.  Извините меня за китайский.

I'm studying Russian every day.     Учи английский, пригодится. Too easy...

Posted Images

Товарищ, скрины спидтеста будут?

 

Hi,

 

I'm not sure to understand, I've posted a couple of traceroutes and throughput tests using tcp/http from various remote hosts using wget. You can find them in my posts on this topic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's an example of a single socket connection with wget.

 

$ wget -O /dev/null http://paris.cdn.mediactive-network.net/speedtest/5000Mo.dat-4

/dev/null             0%[                    ]   7.26M   396KB/s    eta 2h 7m

 

The same target with 5 simultaneous connections:

 

$ aria2c -x5 http://paris.cdn.mediactive-network.net/speedtest/5000Mo.dat-d /dev -o null --allow-overwrite=true --file-allocation=none

[#8e3975 122MiB/4.6GiB(2%) CN:5 DL:2.0MiB ETA:37m58s]

 

PS: Traffic to this host is routed via fiord.net (AS50499) which seems to be their most congested link.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

No I cannot use this.

 

1. It requires a web browser.

2. It requires Flash. I'm never going to install Flash Player on my machine.

3. It opens multiple connections simultaneously (4 iirc).

4. It's proprietary, no documentation, no sources.

 

Так может и компьютер не будете включать, чего мелочиться.

post-22633-0-53721800-1474633067_thumb.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Так может и компьютер не будете включать, чего мелочиться.

 

attachicon.gifsomewhat.jpg

 

 

Ok, I think I'll quit here.

 

I was expecting to find respectable savvies here, not script-kiddies.

 

Quite a disappointment.

 

Thanks @oles and @Melanxolik for the constructive posts though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The Javascript is broken, cannot even click on "BEGIN TEST".

 

See, https://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fbeta.speedtest.net%2F%23&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0

 

302 errors, dozens of unclosed tags and syntax error. How do you want to take this seriously?

 

That would also only concern 2. - All other points are still valid.

 

I also don't understand why you are using this trash, is wget that hard to use?

Edited by Bohic
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

No I cannot use this.

 

1. It requires a web browser.

2. It requires Flash. I'm never going to install Flash Player on my machine.

3. It opens multiple connections simultaneously (4 iirc).

4. It's proprietary, no documentation, no sources.

http://beta.speedtest.net

 

У меня, кстати, раза с сотого нажалось "BEGIN TEST". И то, пришлось обновлять страницу миллион раз.

Link to post
Share on other sites

У меня на Microsoft Internet Exporer из beta кидает просто на http://www.speedtest.net/.

По теме - тестируйте на украинские ресурсы. попробуйте на iperf.volia.net. при таких пингах на сам сайт lanet.ua там у вас и с украинским трафиком худо. может проблемы по трассе а не только на зарубеж.

Link to post
Share on other sites

У меня на Microsoft Internet Exporer из beta кидает просто на http://www.speedtest.net/.

По теме - тестируйте на украинские ресурсы. попробуйте на iperf.volia.net. при таких пингах на сам сайт lanet.ua там у вас и с украинским трафиком худо. может проблемы по трассе а не только на зарубеж.

 

Performances with Ukrainian networks are pretty decent in general.

 

$ iperf3 -c iperf.volia.net -P1 -i 5

Connecting to host iperf.volia.net, port 5201

[  4] local 176.36.0.0 port 56870 connected to 82.144.193.18 port 5201

[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr  Cwnd

[  4]   0.00-5.00   sec  51.3 MBytes  86.1 Mbits/sec   75    103 KBytes       

[  4]   5.00-10.00  sec  50.6 MBytes  85.0 Mbits/sec   82   73.5 KBytes       

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr

[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec   102 MBytes  85.5 Mbits/sec  157             sender

[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec   101 MBytes  85.1 Mbits/sec                  receiver

 

$ iperf3 -c iperf.volia.net -P1 -i 5 -R

Connecting to host iperf.volia.net, port 5201

Reverse mode, remote host iperf.volia.net is sending

[  4] local 176.36.0.0 port 56882 connected to 82.144.193.18 port 5201

[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth

[  4]   0.00-5.00   sec  55.8 MBytes  93.6 Mbits/sec                  

[  4]   5.00-10.00  sec  55.7 MBytes  93.4 Mbits/sec                  

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr

[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec   112 MBytes  93.8 Mbits/sec  175             sender

[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec   112 MBytes  93.6 Mbits/sec                  receiver

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't think I am picky, but show iperf test to speedtest.serverius.net and ping.online.net

 

Unfortunately,

 

$ iperf3 -c ping.online.net -P1 -i 5 -R

iperf3: error - the server is busy running a test. try again later

 

$ iperf3 -c speedtest.serverius.net -P1 -i 5 -p 5002 -R -t 30

iperf3: error - the server is busy running a test. try again later

 

But I can run an iperf3 in server mode on a machine that's on the same network:

 

$ iperf3 -c 195.154.0.0 -P1 -i 5 -R -t 30

Connecting to host 195.154.0.0, port 5201

Reverse mode, remote host 195.154.166.219 is sending

[  4] local 176.36.0.0 port 55786 connected to 195.154.0.0 port 5201

[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth

[  4]   0.00-5.00   sec  5.08 MBytes  8.52 Mbits/sec                  

[  4]   5.00-10.00  sec  2.53 MBytes  4.24 Mbits/sec                  

[  4]  10.00-15.00  sec  2.02 MBytes  3.40 Mbits/sec                  

[  4]  15.00-20.00  sec  1.86 MBytes  3.12 Mbits/sec                  

[  4]  20.00-25.00  sec  2.34 MBytes  3.92 Mbits/sec                  

[  4]  25.00-30.00  sec  3.05 MBytes  5.11 Mbits/sec                  

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr

[  4]   0.00-30.00  sec  17.2 MBytes  4.82 Mbits/sec   55             sender

[  4]   0.00-30.00  sec  17.0 MBytes  4.75 Mbits/sec                  receiver

 

 Host                                         Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

 1. 195-154-0-1.rev.poneytelecom.eu          0.0%    12    0.9   2.6   0.8   6.6   2.0

 2. a9k1-45x-s44-1.dc3.poneytelecom.eu         0.0%    12    0.6   0.7   0.5   1.9   0.3

 3. bb1-dc3-bb1.ams1.poneytelecom.eu           0.0%    12   12.0  12.1  12.0  12.2   0.0

 4. bb1-n9k1-be101.ams1.poneytelecom.eu        0.0%    12   11.4  11.4  11.3  11.6   0.0

 5. 62.140.243-122.fiord.ru                    0.0%    11   11.7  12.2  11.6  14.7   0.9

 6. kiev-nt-b1-ae3-vlan3832.fiord.net          0.0%    11   49.0  48.8  48.8  49.0   0.0

 7. lanet-gw.fiord.net                         0.0%    11   48.8  48.8  48.7  48.9   0.0

 8. host-176-36-0-0.la.net.ua               0.0%    11   48.8  48.8  48.7  49.1   0.0

 

(it gets prettier in the evening).

Edited by Bohic
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

don't think I am picky, but show iperf test to speedtest.serverius.net and ping.online.net

 

Unfortunately,

 

$ iperf3 -c ping.online.net -P1 -i 5 -R

iperf3: error - the server is busy running a test. try again later

 

$ iperf3 -c speedtest.serverius.net -P1 -i 5 -p 5002 -R -t 30

iperf3: error - the server is busy running a test. try again later

 

But I can run an iperf3 in server mode on a machine that's on the same network:

 

$ iperf3 -c 195.154.0.0 -P1 -i 5 -R -t 30

Connecting to host 195.154.0.0, port 5201

Reverse mode, remote host 195.154.166.219 is sending

[  4] local 176.36.0.0 port 55786 connected to 195.154.0.0 port 5201

[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth

[  4]   0.00-5.00   sec  5.08 MBytes  8.52 Mbits/sec                  

[  4]   5.00-10.00  sec  2.53 MBytes  4.24 Mbits/sec                  

[  4]  10.00-15.00  sec  2.02 MBytes  3.40 Mbits/sec                  

[  4]  15.00-20.00  sec  1.86 MBytes  3.12 Mbits/sec                  

[  4]  20.00-25.00  sec  2.34 MBytes  3.92 Mbits/sec                  

[  4]  25.00-30.00  sec  3.05 MBytes  5.11 Mbits/sec                  

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr

[  4]   0.00-30.00  sec  17.2 MBytes  4.82 Mbits/sec   55             sender

[  4]   0.00-30.00  sec  17.0 MBytes  4.75 Mbits/sec                  receiver

 

 Host                                         Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev

 1. 195-154-0-1.rev.poneytelecom.eu          0.0%    12    0.9   2.6   0.8   6.6   2.0

 2. a9k1-45x-s44-1.dc3.poneytelecom.eu         0.0%    12    0.6   0.7   0.5   1.9   0.3

 3. bb1-dc3-bb1.ams1.poneytelecom.eu           0.0%    12   12.0  12.1  12.0  12.2   0.0

 4. bb1-n9k1-be101.ams1.poneytelecom.eu        0.0%    12   11.4  11.4  11.3  11.6   0.0

 5. 62.140.243-122.fiord.ru                    0.0%    11   11.7  12.2  11.6  14.7   0.9

 6. kiev-nt-b1-ae3-vlan3832.fiord.net          0.0%    11   49.0  48.8  48.8  49.0   0.0

 7. lanet-gw.fiord.net                         0.0%    11   48.8  48.8  48.7  48.9   0.0

 8. host-176-36-0-0.la.net.ua               0.0%    11   48.8  48.8  48.7  49.1   0.0

 

(it gets prettier in the evening).

 

Try iperf earlier version

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The Javascript is broken, cannot even click on "BEGIN TEST".

 

See, https://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fbeta.speedtest.net%2F%23&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0

 

302 errors, dozens of unclosed tags and syntax error. How do you want to take this seriously?

 

That would also only concern 2. - All other points are still valid.

 

I also don't understand why you are using this trash, is wget that hard to use?

Ну треш так треш.

И чего это я парюсь, это же не у меня ланет и 2 мбита скорость в зарубеж :)

Edited by Den_LocalNet
Link to post
Share on other sites

ask noc@lanet.ua to assign you IP's from networks which are routed via other Lanet upstream (not via Fiord) or buy VPN service to outsideword from ISP from zone where you have perfect connect - UA-IX zone (as I remember Netassist sometime ago dealing with such methods)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...