Bohic Posted September 23, 2016 at 10:00 AM Author Posted September 23, 2016 at 10:00 AM странное заявление на русскоязычном форуме! It was a reaction to his attempt to write a sentence in English. Furthemore I did not know that this is a forum about Russian language. I thought that it was about networks in Ukraine.
John_Doe Posted September 23, 2016 at 10:07 AM Posted September 23, 2016 at 10:07 AM Чудак по ходу троль )
Bohic Posted September 23, 2016 at 10:38 AM Author Posted September 23, 2016 at 10:38 AM Чудак по ходу троль ) Do you have anything constructive to write but your insults? If no then I'd appreciate that you stay out of this discussion.
wantmore Posted September 23, 2016 at 10:41 AM Posted September 23, 2016 at 10:41 AM Товарищ, скрины спидтеста будут?
Bohic Posted September 23, 2016 at 11:12 AM Author Posted September 23, 2016 at 11:12 AM Товарищ, скрины спидтеста будут? Hi, I'm not sure to understand, I've posted a couple of traceroutes and throughput tests using tcp/http from various remote hosts using wget. You can find them in my posts on this topic.
wantmore Posted September 23, 2016 at 11:39 AM Posted September 23, 2016 at 11:39 AM Товарищ, скрины спидтеста будут? Hi, I'm not sure to understand, I've posted a couple of traceroutes and throughput tests using tcp/http from various remote hosts using wget. You can find them in my posts on this topic. Http://speedtest.net
Bohic Posted September 23, 2016 at 11:54 AM Author Posted September 23, 2016 at 11:54 AM Http://speedtest.net No I cannot use this. 1. It requires a web browser. 2. It requires Flash. I'm never going to install Flash Player on my machine. 3. It opens multiple connections simultaneously (4 iirc). 4. It's proprietary, no documentation, no sources.
Bohic Posted September 23, 2016 at 12:15 PM Author Posted September 23, 2016 at 12:15 PM That's an example of a single socket connection with wget. $ wget -O /dev/null http://paris.cdn.mediactive-network.net/speedtest/5000Mo.dat-4 /dev/null 0%[ ] 7.26M 396KB/s eta 2h 7m The same target with 5 simultaneous connections: $ aria2c -x5 http://paris.cdn.mediactive-network.net/speedtest/5000Mo.dat-d /dev -o null --allow-overwrite=true --file-allocation=none [#8e3975 122MiB/4.6GiB(2%) CN:5 DL:2.0MiB ETA:37m58s] PS: Traffic to this host is routed via fiord.net (AS50499) which seems to be their most congested link.
wantmore Posted September 23, 2016 at 12:19 PM Posted September 23, 2016 at 12:19 PM Http://speedtest.net No I cannot use this. 1. It requires a web browser. 2. It requires Flash. I'm never going to install Flash Player on my machine. 3. It opens multiple connections simultaneously (4 iirc). 4. It's proprietary, no documentation, no sources. Так может и компьютер не будете включать, чего мелочиться.
Bohic Posted September 23, 2016 at 12:27 PM Author Posted September 23, 2016 at 12:27 PM Так может и компьютер не будете включать, чего мелочиться. somewhat.jpg Ok, I think I'll quit here. I was expecting to find respectable savvies here, not script-kiddies. Quite a disappointment. Thanks @oles and @Melanxolik for the constructive posts though.
Den_LocalNet Posted September 23, 2016 at 12:58 PM Posted September 23, 2016 at 12:58 PM Http://speedtest.net No I cannot use this. 1. It requires a web browser. 2. It requires Flash. I'm never going to install Flash Player on my machine. 3. It opens multiple connections simultaneously (4 iirc). 4. It's proprietary, no documentation, no sources. http://beta.speedtest.net
Bohic Posted September 23, 2016 at 01:05 PM Author Posted September 23, 2016 at 01:05 PM (edited) http://beta.speedtest.net The Javascript is broken, cannot even click on "BEGIN TEST". See, https://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fbeta.speedtest.net%2F%23&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0 302 errors, dozens of unclosed tags and syntax error. How do you want to take this seriously? That would also only concern 2. - All other points are still valid. I also don't understand why you are using this trash, is wget that hard to use? Edited September 23, 2016 at 01:11 PM by Bohic
0x00000001 Posted September 23, 2016 at 01:08 PM Posted September 23, 2016 at 01:08 PM Http://speedtest.net No I cannot use this. 1. It requires a web browser. 2. It requires Flash. I'm never going to install Flash Player on my machine. 3. It opens multiple connections simultaneously (4 iirc). 4. It's proprietary, no documentation, no sources. http://beta.speedtest.net У меня, кстати, раза с сотого нажалось "BEGIN TEST". И то, пришлось обновлять страницу миллион раз.
wantmore Posted September 23, 2016 at 01:15 PM Posted September 23, 2016 at 01:15 PM Проверил в хроме и опере http://beta.speedtest.net - нормально работает
0x00000001 Posted September 23, 2016 at 01:17 PM Posted September 23, 2016 at 01:17 PM Нажимаю, и все, что происходит - добавляется # к url (http://beta.speedtest.net/#)
Bohic Posted September 23, 2016 at 01:19 PM Author Posted September 23, 2016 at 01:19 PM (edited) Проверил в хроме и опере http://beta.speedtest.net - нормально работает Yes, it may even work with Microsoft Internet Exporer. But there are people who are not willing to run trash on their computer and I'm part of them. Edited September 23, 2016 at 01:19 PM by Bohic
Matou Posted September 23, 2016 at 01:26 PM Posted September 23, 2016 at 01:26 PM У меня на Microsoft Internet Exporer из beta кидает просто на http://www.speedtest.net/. По теме - тестируйте на украинские ресурсы. попробуйте на iperf.volia.net. при таких пингах на сам сайт lanet.ua там у вас и с украинским трафиком худо. может проблемы по трассе а не только на зарубеж.
Bohic Posted September 23, 2016 at 01:33 PM Author Posted September 23, 2016 at 01:33 PM У меня на Microsoft Internet Exporer из beta кидает просто на http://www.speedtest.net/. По теме - тестируйте на украинские ресурсы. попробуйте на iperf.volia.net. при таких пингах на сам сайт lanet.ua там у вас и с украинским трафиком худо. может проблемы по трассе а не только на зарубеж. Performances with Ukrainian networks are pretty decent in general. $ iperf3 -c iperf.volia.net -P1 -i 5 Connecting to host iperf.volia.net, port 5201 [ 4] local 176.36.0.0 port 56870 connected to 82.144.193.18 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd [ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 51.3 MBytes 86.1 Mbits/sec 75 103 KBytes [ 4] 5.00-10.00 sec 50.6 MBytes 85.0 Mbits/sec 82 73.5 KBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 102 MBytes 85.5 Mbits/sec 157 sender [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 101 MBytes 85.1 Mbits/sec receiver $ iperf3 -c iperf.volia.net -P1 -i 5 -R Connecting to host iperf.volia.net, port 5201 Reverse mode, remote host iperf.volia.net is sending [ 4] local 176.36.0.0 port 56882 connected to 82.144.193.18 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 55.8 MBytes 93.6 Mbits/sec [ 4] 5.00-10.00 sec 55.7 MBytes 93.4 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 112 MBytes 93.8 Mbits/sec 175 sender [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 112 MBytes 93.6 Mbits/sec receiver
Matou Posted September 23, 2016 at 02:04 PM Posted September 23, 2016 at 02:04 PM (edited) don't think I am picky, but show iperf test to speedtest.serverius.net and ping.online.net Edited September 23, 2016 at 02:04 PM by Matou
Bohic Posted September 23, 2016 at 02:22 PM Author Posted September 23, 2016 at 02:22 PM (edited) don't think I am picky, but show iperf test to speedtest.serverius.net and ping.online.net Unfortunately, $ iperf3 -c ping.online.net -P1 -i 5 -R iperf3: error - the server is busy running a test. try again later $ iperf3 -c speedtest.serverius.net -P1 -i 5 -p 5002 -R -t 30 iperf3: error - the server is busy running a test. try again later But I can run an iperf3 in server mode on a machine that's on the same network: $ iperf3 -c 195.154.0.0 -P1 -i 5 -R -t 30 Connecting to host 195.154.0.0, port 5201 Reverse mode, remote host 195.154.166.219 is sending [ 4] local 176.36.0.0 port 55786 connected to 195.154.0.0 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 5.08 MBytes 8.52 Mbits/sec [ 4] 5.00-10.00 sec 2.53 MBytes 4.24 Mbits/sec [ 4] 10.00-15.00 sec 2.02 MBytes 3.40 Mbits/sec [ 4] 15.00-20.00 sec 1.86 MBytes 3.12 Mbits/sec [ 4] 20.00-25.00 sec 2.34 MBytes 3.92 Mbits/sec [ 4] 25.00-30.00 sec 3.05 MBytes 5.11 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-30.00 sec 17.2 MBytes 4.82 Mbits/sec 55 sender [ 4] 0.00-30.00 sec 17.0 MBytes 4.75 Mbits/sec receiver Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. 195-154-0-1.rev.poneytelecom.eu 0.0% 12 0.9 2.6 0.8 6.6 2.0 2. a9k1-45x-s44-1.dc3.poneytelecom.eu 0.0% 12 0.6 0.7 0.5 1.9 0.3 3. bb1-dc3-bb1.ams1.poneytelecom.eu 0.0% 12 12.0 12.1 12.0 12.2 0.0 4. bb1-n9k1-be101.ams1.poneytelecom.eu 0.0% 12 11.4 11.4 11.3 11.6 0.0 5. 62.140.243-122.fiord.ru 0.0% 11 11.7 12.2 11.6 14.7 0.9 6. kiev-nt-b1-ae3-vlan3832.fiord.net 0.0% 11 49.0 48.8 48.8 49.0 0.0 7. lanet-gw.fiord.net 0.0% 11 48.8 48.8 48.7 48.9 0.0 8. host-176-36-0-0.la.net.ua 0.0% 11 48.8 48.8 48.7 49.1 0.0 (it gets prettier in the evening). Edited September 23, 2016 at 02:25 PM by Bohic
Matou Posted September 23, 2016 at 05:39 PM Posted September 23, 2016 at 05:39 PM don't think I am picky, but show iperf test to speedtest.serverius.net and ping.online.net Unfortunately, $ iperf3 -c ping.online.net -P1 -i 5 -R iperf3: error - the server is busy running a test. try again later $ iperf3 -c speedtest.serverius.net -P1 -i 5 -p 5002 -R -t 30 iperf3: error - the server is busy running a test. try again later But I can run an iperf3 in server mode on a machine that's on the same network: $ iperf3 -c 195.154.0.0 -P1 -i 5 -R -t 30 Connecting to host 195.154.0.0, port 5201 Reverse mode, remote host 195.154.166.219 is sending [ 4] local 176.36.0.0 port 55786 connected to 195.154.0.0 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 5.08 MBytes 8.52 Mbits/sec [ 4] 5.00-10.00 sec 2.53 MBytes 4.24 Mbits/sec [ 4] 10.00-15.00 sec 2.02 MBytes 3.40 Mbits/sec [ 4] 15.00-20.00 sec 1.86 MBytes 3.12 Mbits/sec [ 4] 20.00-25.00 sec 2.34 MBytes 3.92 Mbits/sec [ 4] 25.00-30.00 sec 3.05 MBytes 5.11 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-30.00 sec 17.2 MBytes 4.82 Mbits/sec 55 sender [ 4] 0.00-30.00 sec 17.0 MBytes 4.75 Mbits/sec receiver Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. 195-154-0-1.rev.poneytelecom.eu 0.0% 12 0.9 2.6 0.8 6.6 2.0 2. a9k1-45x-s44-1.dc3.poneytelecom.eu 0.0% 12 0.6 0.7 0.5 1.9 0.3 3. bb1-dc3-bb1.ams1.poneytelecom.eu 0.0% 12 12.0 12.1 12.0 12.2 0.0 4. bb1-n9k1-be101.ams1.poneytelecom.eu 0.0% 12 11.4 11.4 11.3 11.6 0.0 5. 62.140.243-122.fiord.ru 0.0% 11 11.7 12.2 11.6 14.7 0.9 6. kiev-nt-b1-ae3-vlan3832.fiord.net 0.0% 11 49.0 48.8 48.8 49.0 0.0 7. lanet-gw.fiord.net 0.0% 11 48.8 48.8 48.7 48.9 0.0 8. host-176-36-0-0.la.net.ua 0.0% 11 48.8 48.8 48.7 49.1 0.0 (it gets prettier in the evening). Try iperf earlier version
skybetik Posted September 23, 2016 at 05:52 PM Posted September 23, 2016 at 05:52 PM (edited) http://speedtest.serverius.net/ iperf -c speedtest.serverius.net -P 10 Edited September 23, 2016 at 05:53 PM by skybetik
Den_LocalNet Posted September 23, 2016 at 09:59 PM Posted September 23, 2016 at 09:59 PM (edited) http://beta.speedtest.netThe Javascript is broken, cannot even click on "BEGIN TEST". See, https://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fbeta.speedtest.net%2F%23&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0 302 errors, dozens of unclosed tags and syntax error. How do you want to take this seriously? That would also only concern 2. - All other points are still valid. I also don't understand why you are using this trash, is wget that hard to use? Ну треш так треш.И чего это я парюсь, это же не у меня ланет и 2 мбита скорость в зарубеж Edited September 23, 2016 at 09:59 PM by Den_LocalNet
oles Posted September 24, 2016 at 06:05 AM Posted September 24, 2016 at 06:05 AM ask noc@lanet.ua to assign you IP's from networks which are routed via other Lanet upstream (not via Fiord) or buy VPN service to outsideword from ISP from zone where you have perfect connect - UA-IX zone (as I remember Netassist sometime ago dealing with such methods)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now